In re Fusco

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fusco

147 A.3d 873, 227 N.J. 44, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 1163

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 2, 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-292, concluding that the ethics complaint filed against ANTHONY J. FUSCO, JR., of PASSAIC, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

[45] It is ORDERED that the complaint filed against ANTHONY J. FUSCO, JR., in District Docket No. VII-2013-0038E, is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-292, concluding that the ethics complaint filed against ANTHONY J. FUSCO, JR., of PASSAIC, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

[45] It is ORDERED that the complaint filed against ANTHONY J. FUSCO, JR., in District Docket No. VII-2013-0038E, is hereby dismissed.

In re Fusco, 147 A.3d 873, 227 N.J. 44, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 1163 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

147 A.3d 873 (In re Fusco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.