In re Fury
148 A.D.2d 452, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2474
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Fury. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 A.D.2d 259 →
Opinion
The respondent has tendered his resignation as an attorney by affidavit dated June 20,1988.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is,
Ordered that the resignation is not accepted; the respondent has been disbarred (see, Matter of Fury, 145 AD2d . 259). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Fury, 148 A.D.2d 452, 538 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
148 A.D.2d 452 (In re Fury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.