In Re Fulwood Enterprises, Inc.

149 B.R. 712, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 363, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 76, 1993 WL 13761
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 1993
DocketBankruptcy 82-0818-8P1, 82-0923-8P1
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 149 B.R. 712 (In Re Fulwood Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Fulwood Enterprises, Inc., 149 B.R. 712, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 363, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 76, 1993 WL 13761 (Fla. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIORITY FILED ON FEBRUARY 21, 1984 BY LEROY GONZALEZ, JR.

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.

THIS IS a Chapter 11 case commenced by a voluntary Petition of Relief filed by Fulwood Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Fulwood Farms, Ronnie D. Fulwood and Glinda Ful-wood (Debtors) on April 27, 1982. The matter under consideration is a Request for Payment of Administrative Expenses and Establishment of Priority filed on February 21, 1984, by LeRoy Gonzalez, Jr. (Gonzalez). Gonzalez seeks reimbursement as administrative expense for $60,000.00 he claims to have advanced to the corporate Debtor during the Chapter 11 proceeding to enable the Debtor to pay its payroll taxes. It is Gonzalezs’ contention that the loan was made at the Debtor’s request and was necessary for the Debtor to continue its business. An Objection was filed by the Trustee on March 15, 1984. The Trustee’s objection to the payment is based on the following: (1) Gonzalez should not be able to collect on the debt because the loan was usurious; (2) Gonzalez failed to obtain Court approval of the loan and thus this Court should not grant nunc pro tunc approval of the loan; (3) The loan was made to individuals and not to Fulwood Enterprises, Inc.; and (4) Even if Fulwood Enterprises was indebted to Gonzalez, it should be credited $5,000.00 for a check cashed by Gonzalez.

The procedural background relating to the matter under consideration, as appears from the record, can be summarized as follows:

On August 11, 1983, this Court entered an Order which revoked the Debtor’s previously-granted authorization to continue to operate its business and appointed Logan D. Browning as Trustee pursuant to § 1104 of the Bankruptcy Code. On September 7, 1983, this Court entered an Order and authorized the Trustee to continue to operate the Debtors’ business. On September 12, 1983, the Official Creditors Committee filed a Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement, which was superseded by a Joint Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement filed by the Debtor on February 10, 1984. The February 10th Joint Plan, in turn, was superseded by the Debt- or’s Amended Joint Plan filed on May 14, 1984. On September 19,1984, an Amended Disclosure Statement and Amended Plan was filed, and on October 18, 1984, this Court entered an Order confirming the Plan of Reorganization.

*714 Several years later, Logan D. Browning, the Trustee (Trustee), died, and this Court appointed his wife, Barbara Browning, as successor Trustee on August 2, 1991. Ms. Browning was directed to complete the consummation of the confirmed Chapter 11 Plan without further delay. After Ms. Browning completed the administration of the Plan and resolved all adversary matters necessary for closing the case, it became apparent that Gonzalezs’ Request for Payment of Administrative Expenses, filed more than eight years ago, had never been acted upon. It is without dispute that no order was ever entered on the Request which either granted or denied the payment of administrative expenses to Gonzalez.

In order to complete the administration of the estate, this Court scheduled a hearing for September 23,1992. On September 28, 1992, the Trustee filed a Motion for Continuance, which this Court granted, rescheduling the hearing for November 25, 1992.

Gonzalez contends that in April, 1983, after the commencement of the Chapter 11 case, he loaned Ronnie Fulwood (Fulwood), a principal of the corporate Debtor, a total dollar amount of $60,000.00, over two installments, at Fulwood’s request. The first installment, in the amount of $25,000.00, was paid, according to Gonzalez, on May 1, 1983, and the second installment, in the amount of $35,000.00 on June 1, 1983. These loans were made to enable the Debt- or to pay accrued payroll taxes which remained unpaid post-petition. Gonzalez admits that when he made these loans to the Debtor, he knew of the pendency of the Chapter 11 case. Gonzalez contends, however, that he was not aware of the fact that a Debtor must obtain permission from the Court to borrow funds. He further contends that since the monies were paid on the Debtor’s payroll tax obligation, a properly charged cost of administration, he is entitled to step into the shoes of the Government and enjoy the same priority status as the Government could have had pursuant to § 503(b)(l)(B)(i).

Based on the foregoing, Gonzalez contends that he is entitled to have these alleged loans to this corporate Debtor recognized by virtue of § 503(b)(1)(B) of the-Bankruptcy Code, and granted first priority pursuant to § 507(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. The evidence supporting this request reveals that on May 1, 1983, Ronnie Fulwood and Glinda Fulwood, as individuals, signed a promissory note payable to Gonzalez in the face amount of $25,000.00. (Claimant’s Exh. # 1). This transaction purported to be evidenced by a copy of a check signed by Glinda Fulwood and written on a corporate account in the amount of $35,000.00 on June 31, 1983, and a second check also signed by Glinda Fulwood and written on the same corporate account in the amount of $30,000.00 on June 6, 1992. Both checks were payable to Leroy Gonzalez. (Claimant’s Exh. # 2). The promissory note signed by the Fulwoods agreed to repay, within thirty days, the total sum of $25,000.00 with 20% interest. (Claimant’s Exh. # 1). According to Gonzalezs’ corporate income tax form filed in 1983, he wrote off the $60,000.00 which he allegedly loaned to the corporation as a Bad Debt deduction and claimed it as short-term Capital Loss. (Claimant’s Exh. #3). According to the testimony of the C.P.A. employed by the Trustee, the corporate Debt- or made a payment of $5,000.00 to Gonzalez on July 11, 1983. This payment was drawn on the corporate account and made payable to Leroy Gonzalez. (Debtor’s Exh. # 1). This $5,000.00 check was the only cancelled check available when the check register indicated the following: On June 6, 1983, a check was drawn on the corporate account in the amount of $30,000.00, payable to Leroy Gonzalez, with the descriptive legend “Repayment of Loan $25,-000.00; Interest $5,000.00.” On June 31, 1983, another check was drawn on the corporate account in the amount of $35,000.00, also payable to Leroy Gonzalez, with the descriptive legend “Loan Repayment $30,-000.00; Interest $5,000.00.” (Debtor’s Exhibit #2). As noted earlier, the original checks are not available. Moreover, it appears that Gonzalez loaned additional monies to Ronnie Fulwood, the principal of the Debtor corporation. Although Gonzalez insists that his loans were made to the corpo *715 rate Debtor, he repeatedly stated that he loaned the monies to “him” in order to help him out of his tax problem with the Internal Revenue Service. As noted earlier, the Debtor neither sought leave from this Court to borrow these funds, nor was an Order entered authorizing him to borrow these funds. Since February 21, 1984, when he filed this Request for Payment, Gonzalez has taken no steps to pursue this matter seriously or to demand repayment of these so-called loans which he now claims should be properly charged as costs of administration.

In opposing this Request, it is the Trustee’s position that: first, these so-called loans were not authorized; and second, if they were authorized, they were made to the individuals, Ronnie and Glinda Ful-wood, and, therefore, have been repaid by the Debtors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Moody & Sons, Inc.
473 B.R. 828 (M.D. Florida, 2012)
In Re Industrial Commercial Electrical, Inc.
304 B.R. 24 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
In Re Atcall, Inc.
284 B.R. 791 (E.D. Virginia, 2002)
In Re Visi-Trak, Inc.
266 B.R. 372 (N.D. Ohio, 2001)
In Re Beverage Canners International Corp.
255 B.R. 89 (S.D. Florida, 2000)
In Re Bertelt
206 B.R. 587 (M.D. Florida, 1996)
In Re Glen Eden Hospital Inc.
172 B.R. 538 (E.D. Michigan, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 B.R. 712, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 363, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 76, 1993 WL 13761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fulwood-enterprises-inc-flmb-1993.