In re Fulmer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fulmer

705 A.2d 765, 152 N.J. 430, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 113

DecidedFebruary 26, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 705 A.2d 765 (In re Fulmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fulmer, 705 A.2d 765, 152 N.J. 430, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 113 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 20,1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JAY LAWRENCE FULMER of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating Rule 1:21-1(a) (failure to maintain a bona fide office), Rule 1:28-2 (failure to pay the annual assessment to the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection) and RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAY LAWRENCE FULMER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[431]*431ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 20,1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JAY LAWRENCE FULMER of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be reprimanded for violating Rule 1:21-1(a) (failure to maintain a bona fide office), Rule 1:28-2 (failure to pay the annual assessment to the New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection) and RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAY LAWRENCE FULMER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[431]*431ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 A.2d 765, 152 N.J. 430, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fulmer-nj-1998.