In re Fuller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Fuller

228 So. 3d 737, 2017 WL 5146116

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 6, 2017

DocketNO. 2017-B-1668

StatusPublished

This text of 228 So. 3d 737 (In re Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fuller, 228 So. 3d 737, 2017 WL 5146116 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he knowingly violated Rule 4.2(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by communicating with two persons known to be represented by counsel about the subject of the representation and without the consent of their counsel. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Thomas Fuller, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27341, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he knowingly violated Rule 4.2(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by communicating with two persons known to be represented by counsel about the subject of the representation and without the consent of their counsel. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Thomas Fuller, IV, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27341, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 So. 3d 737, 2017 WL 5146116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fuller-la-2017.