in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 3, 2019·No. 03-19-00682-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00682-CV

In re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc. and James Andy Fry

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BURNET COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s

order granting right of partition. Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we deny

the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App.

P. 52.8(a); see also Griffin v. Wolfe, 610 S.W.2d 466, 466-67 (Tex. 1980) (per curiam) (“A

partition case, unlike other proceedings, has two final judgments, and the first one is appealable

as a final judgment.”); Yturria v. Kimbro, 921 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi

1996, no writ) (“The trial court’s initial decree determining partitionability and appointing

commissioners, although often referred to as an interlocutory decree, is a final and appealable

order which is conclusive of all matters decreed within it.”).

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: October 3, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry (in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yturria v. Kimbro
921 S.W.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Griffin v. Wolfe
610 S.W.2d 466 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)