in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry
This text of in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry (in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00682-CV
In re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc. and James Andy Fry
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BURNET COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
order granting right of partition. Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we deny
the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App.
P. 52.8(a); see also Griffin v. Wolfe, 610 S.W.2d 466, 466-67 (Tex. 1980) (per curiam) (“A
partition case, unlike other proceedings, has two final judgments, and the first one is appealable
as a final judgment.”); Yturria v. Kimbro, 921 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi
1996, no writ) (“The trial court’s initial decree determining partitionability and appointing
commissioners, although often referred to as an interlocutory decree, is a final and appealable
order which is conclusive of all matters decreed within it.”). __________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Filed: October 3, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Fry Sons Ranch, Inc., and James Andy Fry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fry-sons-ranch-inc-and-james-andy-fry-texapp-2019.