In re Frost
135 S. Ct. 29, 189 L. Ed. 2d 881, 2014 WL 3891608, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4778
This text of 135 S. Ct. 29 (In re Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Frost, 135 S. Ct. 29, 189 L. Ed. 2d 881, 2014 WL 3891608, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4778 (U.S. 2014).
Opinion
James Albert Frost, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 29, 189 L. Ed. 2d 881, 2014 WL 3891608, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frost-scotus-2014.