in Re: Frost National Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 7, 2008
Docket13-07-00748-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Frost National Bank (in Re: Frost National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Frost National Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00615-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE TRACEY W. MURPHY AND MATTHEW D. WHITMIRE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Vela Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relators, Tracey W. Murphy and Matthew D. Whitmire, filed a pro se petition for writ

of mandamus in the above cause on November 3, 2008, seeking to compel the District

Clerk of Karnes County to file their pleadings.

We do not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. This Court does not have

mandamus jurisdiction over district clerks unless it is shown that issuance of the writ is

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX . GOV'T CODE ANN . § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon

2004); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig.

1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig.

proceeding); see also In re Nubine, No. 13-08-507-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6534, at *1

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op).

Moreover, we do not have mandamus jurisdiction over cases that do not arise from our

court of appeals district. Karnes County is in the Fourth Court of Appeals District rather

than the Thirteenth Court of Appeals District. See TEX . GOV'T CODE ANN . § 22.201 (e), (n)

(Vernon 2004).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

is of the opinion that we lack jurisdiction to consider this matter. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 7th day of November, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Frost National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frost-national-bank-texapp-2008.