In re Frosch

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Frosch

602 N.E.2d 131, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 244, 1992 WL 322985

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 29, 1992

DocketNo. 49S00-9003-DI-198

StatusPublished

This text of 602 N.E.2d 131 (In re Frosch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frosch, 602 N.E.2d 131, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 244, 1992 WL 322985 (Ind. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER STAYING REINSTATEMENT

This Court, having received "Objections to Automatic Reinstatement" filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, now finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 4(c), the matter should be set for hearing and that the reinstatement of Frederick F. Frosch should be stayed until further order of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the reinstatement of Frederick F. Frosch is stayed until further order of this court and that a hearing to determine the question of reinstatement will be set at a date and time to be later determined.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this order in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Dise.R. 8(d).

DeBRULER, DICKSON and KRAHULIK, JJ., concur. GIVAN, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER STAYING REINSTATEMENT

This Court, having received "Objections to Automatic Reinstatement" filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, now finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 4(c), the matter should be set for hearing and that the reinstatement of Frederick F. Frosch should be stayed until further order of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the reinstatement of Frederick F. Frosch is stayed until further order of this court and that a hearing to determine the question of reinstatement will be set at a date and time to be later determined.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this order in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Dise.R. 8(d).

DeBRULER, DICKSON and KRAHULIK, JJ., concur. GIVAN, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 N.E.2d 131, 1992 Ind. LEXIS 244, 1992 WL 322985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frosch-ind-1992.