In re Fromholz
254 A.D. 895, 5 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216
Opinion
Assuming applicant’s services with the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation was practicing in Washington, D. C., she was a resident of New York for two years and nine months of the five-year period of practice in a sister State required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals. Application denied. (Matter of Rotolo, 247 App. Div. 724.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Fromholz, 254 A.D. 895, 5 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 895 (In re Fromholz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Rotolo
247 A.D. 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)