In re Fromholz
This text of 254 A.D. 895 (In re Fromholz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming applicant’s services with the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation was practicing in Washington, D. C., she was a resident of New York for two years and nine months of the five-year period of practice in a sister State required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals. Application denied. (Matter of Rotolo, 247 App. Div. 724.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 895, 5 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fromholz-nyappdiv-1938.