In re Froehlich Rubber Refining Co.

E.D. Pennsylvania

In re Froehlich Rubber Refining Co.

139 F. 201, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 12, 1905

DocketNo. 1,857

StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. 201 (In re Froehlich Rubber Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Froehlich Rubber Refining Co., 139 F. 201, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136 (E.D. Pa. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The question certified to the court by the referee in this case raises the question of ownership of two electric motors claimed by the Manufacturers’ Electric Company from the receiver of this bankrupt. The property, by order of this court, was placed in the possession of the claimant and a bond substituted therefor. The referee finds the property, at the time the petition in bankruptcy was filed and at the time of adjudication, belonged to the bankrupt, and therefore passed to the receiver, the value of which he finds to be $1,470, and directs that this amount be paid by the claimant to the trustee for this machinery. The other machinery mentioned in the report he finds to be the property of the claimant, and affirms its possession and ownership in the same. The findings of fact by the referee are stated in detail, and we think warranted by the evidence submitted. We also agree with the referee in his conclusions of law which are fully set forth in the report.

The order of the referee, made March 22,1905, on the claimant, to pay to the trustee $1,470, is therefore hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The question certified to the court by the referee in this case raises the question of ownership of two electric motors claimed by the Manufacturers’ Electric Company from the receiver of this bankrupt. The property, by order of this court, was placed in the possession of the claimant and a bond substituted therefor. The referee finds the property, at the time the petition in bankruptcy was filed and at the time of adjudication, belonged to the bankrupt, and therefore passed to the receiver, the value of which he finds to be $1,470, and directs that this amount be paid by the claimant to the trustee for this machinery. The other machinery mentioned in the report he finds to be the property of the claimant, and affirms its possession and ownership in the same. The findings of fact by the referee are stated in detail, and we think warranted by the evidence submitted. We also agree with the referee in his conclusions of law which are fully set forth in the report.

The order of the referee, made March 22,1905, on the claimant, to pay to the trustee $1,470, is therefore hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F. 201, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-froehlich-rubber-refining-co-paed-1905.