In re Fritzsche

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Fritzsche

56 F. 819, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2720

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 27, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 F. 819 (In re Fritzsche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fritzsche, 56 F. 819, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2720 (circtsdny 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

There is not as much testimony here as to the commercial designation as I would like to have in determining the case. I am prepared to dispose of it on the testimony of the government chemist, to the effect that this is one of the oils of lemon. That being so, and in the absence of any commercial testimony to show that there is only one kind of oil of lemon, I am inclined to reverse the board of appraisers, and direct the classification under the paragraph providing for oil of lemon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

There is not as much testimony here as to the commercial designation as I would like to have in determining the case. I am prepared to dispose of it on the testimony of the government chemist, to the effect that this is one of the oils of lemon. That being so, and in the absence of any commercial testimony to show that there is only one kind of oil of lemon, I am inclined to reverse the board of appraisers, and direct the classification under the paragraph providing for oil of lemon.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F. 819, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fritzsche-circtsdny-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack