In re Fritzsche

56 F. 819, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2720
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 27, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

There is not as much testimony here as to the commercial designation as I would like to have in determining the case. I am prepared to dispose of it on the testimony of the government chemist, to the effect that this is one of the oils of lemon. That being so, and in the absence of any commercial testimony to show that there is only one kind of oil of lemon, I am inclined to reverse the board of appraisers, and direct the classification under the paragraph providing for oil of lemon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fritzsche, 56 F. 819, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2720 (circtsdny 1893).

56 F. 819 (In re Fritzsche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keyser v. Hinkle
106 S.W. 98 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)