In re Fritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fritz

113 A.D.2d 366, 496 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52381

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.2d 366 (In re Fritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fritz, 113 A.D.2d 366, 496 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

[367]*367OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 12, 1977. Petitioner commenced this proceeding to suspend respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.23 (b) and to stay all pending disciplinary proceedings. The answer submitted on behalf of the respondent indicates that he has no objection to the relief sought.

Based on the pleadings and the medical evidence submitted we find that respondent is incapacitated from practicing law. Therefore, the petition is granted, respondent is suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court and all pending disciplinary proceedings against him are stayed.

Dillon, P. J., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI