In Re Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower v. the State of Texas (In Re Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00331-CV ___________________________
IN RE FRISCO CHRONICLES WHISTLEBLOWER, Relator
Original Proceeding 467th District Court of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 25-5217-467
Before Walker, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party
in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,
relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. We lift our July 10, 2025 stay of the
“Order on Petition for Rule 202 Deposition.”
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 23, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frisco-chronicles-whistleblower-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.