In re Friend

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Friend. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 Cal. Rptr. 3d 313
California Supreme Court·Decided September 2, 2021·No. S256914M·Published

Opinion

Filed 9/1/21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

In re JACK WAYNE FRIEND on Habeas Corpus.

S256914

First Appellate District, Division Three A155955

Alameda County Superior Court 81254A __________________________________________________________

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT: The majority opinion in this case, filed on June 28, 2021, and appearing at 11 Cal.5th 720, is modified as follows: On page 743, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph, the phrase “the statute” is replaced with “section 1509(d),” so that the sentence reads: Applying these principles, we conclude that when section 1509(d) is applied to a post-Proposition 66 petition subsequent to an initial pre-Proposition 66, post-Clark petition, section 1509(d) is not operating retroactively.

1 On page 743, in the third sentence of the second full paragraph, the phrase “This provision of” is added at the beginning of the sentence, so that the sentence begins: This provision of Proposition 66 underscores the importance of presenting available claims in the first petition . . . . This modification does not affect the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Friend, (Cal. 2021).

In re Friend (In re Friend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Friend
489 P.3d 309 (California Supreme Court, 2021)