In re Friedmann

869 A.2d 976
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 2005
DocketNo. 989 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 869 A.2d 976 (In re Friedmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Friedmann, 869 A.2d 976 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2005, Aaron S. Friedmann having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of six months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated September 21, 2004; the said Aaron S. Friedmann having been directed on December 29, 2004, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Aaron S. Friedmann is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of six months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 A.2d 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-friedmann-pa-2005.