In re Friedmann

830 A.2d 952
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 30, 2003
DocketNo. 838 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 830 A.2d 952 (In re Friedmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Friedmann, 830 A.2d 952 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, Gary Friedmann having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three years by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated February 3, 2003; the said Gary Friedmann having been directed on May 19, 2003, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the rea[953]*953sons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Gary Friedmann is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 A.2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-friedmann-pa-2003.