In re Friedman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Friedman

660 So. 2d 25, 1995 La. LEXIS 2395, 1995 WL 553050

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Friedman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 La. LEXIS 3164 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1995·No. No. 95-B-1946·Published

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel La.St.Bar;— Other(s); applying for motion for Interim Suspension Pursuant to Rule XIX Section 19.

ORDER

Premises considered:

IT IS ORDERED that Sam J. Friedman, be and he is hereby, suspended irom the practice of law in the State of Louisiana, pursuant to Rule XIX, Section 19, pending further orders of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Rule XIX, Sections 11 and 19.

/s/ Walter F. Marcus Associate Justice

CALOGERO, DENNIS and WATSON, JJ., not participating. VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Counsel La.St.Bar;— Other(s); applying for motion for Interim Suspension Pursuant to Rule XIX Section 19.

ORDER

Premises considered:

IT IS ORDERED that Sam J. Friedman, be and he is hereby, suspended irom the practice of law in the State of Louisiana, pursuant to Rule XIX, Section 19, pending further orders of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Rule XIX, Sections 11 and 19.

/s/ Walter F. Marcus Associate Justice

CALOGERO, DENNIS and WATSON, JJ., not participating. VICTORY, J., not on panel.

In re Friedman, 660 So. 2d 25, 1995 La. LEXIS 2395, 1995 WL 553050 (La. 1995).

Pincite

660 So. 2d 25 (In re Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.