In re Friedman

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Friedman

189 Ill. 2d 710

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 2000

DocketMR 16711

StatusPublished

This text of 189 Ill. 2d 710 (In re Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Friedman, 189 Ill. 2d 710 (Ill. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Robert Mitchel Friedman, who has been disciplined in the State of Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Arizona.

Respondent Robert Mitchel Friedman shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Robert Mitchel Friedman, who has been disciplined in the State of Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Arizona.

Respondent Robert Mitchel Friedman shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. 2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-friedman-ill-2000.