In re Friedman
This text of In re Friedman (In re Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-XX-XXXXXXX 24-APR-2019 SCPR-XX-XXXXXXX 01:27 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN RE LEE S. FRIEDMAN, Petitioner.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE (By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in the State of Hawai#i filed by attorney Lee S. Friedman, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude Petitioner Friedman has complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Lee S. Friedman, attorney number 2839, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the filing of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 24, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Friedman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-friedman-haw-2019.