In re Fried

New York Court of Appeals

In re Fried

214 N.E.2d 371, 17 N.Y.2d 488, 267 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1659

DecidedJanuary 6, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 214 N.E.2d 371 (In re Fried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fried, 214 N.E.2d 371, 17 N.Y.2d 488, 267 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1659 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that he was denied due process of law in violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any of appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 16 hi Y 2d 1014.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that he was denied due process of law in violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any of appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 16 hi Y 2d 1014.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 N.E.2d 371, 17 N.Y.2d 488, 267 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fried-ny-1966.