In re Frey

New York Supreme Court

In re Frey

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 306

DecidedJanuary 2, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 306 (In re Frey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frey, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 306 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Scott, J.

The duty and responsibility of passing upon the sufficiency of sureties is cast by the law in the first instance upon the special deputy commissioner of excise. His determination thereon should not be overruled by the court, unless it be made to appear that his rejection of a surety has been unreasonable or capricious. I cannot find that it is either. I see no reason therefore for making any order in the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott, J.

The duty and responsibility of passing upon the sufficiency of sureties is cast by the law in the first instance upon the special deputy commissioner of excise. His determination thereon should not be overruled by the court, unless it be made to appear that his rejection of a surety has been unreasonable or capricious. I cannot find that it is either. I see no reason therefore for making any order in the premises.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frey-nysupct-1904.