In re Frey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Frey

931 A.2d 594, 192 N.J. 444, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1094

DecidedSeptember 24, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 931 A.2d 594 (In re Frey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frey, 931 A.2d 594, 192 N.J. 444, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1094 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-122, concluding that THOMAS G. FREY of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safe[445]*445guard third party funds), RPC 4.1(a)(l)(false statement of material fact or law to a third person), RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d)(conduet prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS G. FREY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-122, concluding that THOMAS G. FREY of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safe[445]*445guard third party funds), RPC 4.1(a)(l)(false statement of material fact or law to a third person), RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d)(conduet prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS G. FREY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

931 A.2d 594, 192 N.J. 444, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frey-nj-2007.