In re Frelix
27 N.Y.3d 1060
This text of 27 N.Y.3d 1060 (In re Frelix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Frelix, 27 N.Y.3d 1060 (N.Y. 2016).
Opinion
[1061]*1061On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals (see 22 NYCRR 500.9, 500.10). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals (see 22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 N.Y.3d 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frelix-ny-2016.