In re Freeman

422 S.E.2d 2, 262 Ga. 457, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2372, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Freeman. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 Ga. 821
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1992·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 1028·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent L. Howard Freeman has petitioned for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. The petition is based upon admission of a violation of a standard of State Bar Rule 4-102.

We adopt the State Disciplinary Board Review Panel’s recommendation that respondent’s petition be accepted and direct that he be allowed to surrender his license to practice law. Respondent is reminded that he must comply with all requirements of Bar Rule 4-219 (c). Because voluntary surrender of a license is tantamount to disbarment, before reinstatement will be considered respondent must comply with reinstatement procedures of the State Bar of Georgia in effect at the time of any reinstatement petition.

[458]*458Decided October 16, 1992. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

The application for voluntary surrender of license is granted.

Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham, Fletcher and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Freeman, 422 S.E.2d 2, 262 Ga. 457, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2372, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 894 (Ga. 1992).

422 S.E.2d 2 (In re Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.