In re Freeman Cotting Coat Co.

212 F. 551, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 984

District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided October 22, 1913·No. No. 18,581·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MORTON, District Judge.

The original petition was good upon its face and was brought in good faith. There is no evidence that the intervening creditors were aware of the facts upon which the estoppel [552] against the principal petitioners arises, nor that they did not act in good faith in intervening. The intervening petitions were properly and seasonably filed.

The motions to dismiss the intervening petitions are severalty denied. See Re Bedingfield (D. C.) 96 Fed. 190; Re Ryan (D. C.) 114 Fed. 373; Re Lewis F. Perry & Whitney Co. (D. C.) 172 Fed. 744.

No further suggestions having been made by the parties, in accordance with the opinion herein dated 'July 28, 1913, the petition in bankruptcy is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORTON, District Judge.

The motions to dismiss the intervening petitions are severalty denied. See Re Bedingfield (D. C.) 96 Fed. 190; Re Ryan (D. C.) 114 Fed. 373; Re Lewis F. Perry & Whitney Co. (D. C.) 172 Fed. 744.

No further suggestions having been made by the parties, in accordance with the opinion herein dated 'July 28, 1913, the petition in bankruptcy is dismissed, without costs.

In re Freeman Cotting Coat Co., 212 F. 551, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 984 (D. Mass. 1913).

Pincite

212 F. 551 (In re Freeman Cotting Coat Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In re Kootenai Motor Co.

41 F.2d 399 (D. Idaho, 1930)

In re Maryanov

20 F.2d 939 (E.D. New York, 1927)

In Re Diamond Fuel Co.

6 F.2d 773 (Second Circuit, 1925)

In re Seifred

293 F. 936 (D. Massachusetts, 1923)

Opinion

Related