In re Freedman
821 A.2d 1247, 573 Pa. 142, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 814
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 2003·No. No. 905 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated January 31, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
[143] Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Freedman, 821 A.2d 1247, 573 Pa. 142, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 814 (Pa. 2003).
821 A.2d 1247 (In re Freedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Lord
910 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)