in Re Frediz De La Cruz De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas
This text of in Re Frediz De La Cruz De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas (in Re Frediz De La Cruz De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-22-00108-CR
IN RE Frediz DE LA CRUZ De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas, Relators
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2022
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On February 21, 2022, Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering
the petition and the record, this court concludes Relators are not entitled to the relief sought.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Relators’ efforts to have the Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Presiding Judge of the Sixth Administrative Judicial Region, Kerr County, Texas, to reinstate three county court at law judges “to alleviate the crowded dockets in Kinney County.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Frediz De La Cruz De La Cruz and Elio Enay Rudamas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frediz-de-la-cruz-de-la-cruz-and-elio-enay-rudamas-texapp-2022.