in Re Frederick R. Sherron, D.O.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Frederick R. Sherron, D.O.

DecidedOctober 14, 2020

Docket13-20-00422-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Frederick R. Sherron, D.O. (in Re Frederick R. Sherron, D.O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Frederick R. Sherron, D.O., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00422-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE FREDERICK R. SHERRON, D.O.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Relator Frederick R. Sherron, D.O., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

alleging that respondent, the Honorable Mark H. Woerner, presiding judge of the County

Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relator

without an adequate appellate remedy, by granting a “Motion to Compel Defendant to

Produce an Expert Report Pursuant to TRCP 194.2(f)” filed by real party in interest Gary

Loveday.

Having reviewed the petition and the record documents attached thereto, we hereby ORDER the real party in interest to file any response to relator’s petition with this

Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 30, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th day of October, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI