in Re Fred T. Philips and Mercedes Philips
This text of in Re Fred T. Philips and Mercedes Philips (in Re Fred T. Philips and Mercedes Philips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00312-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE FRED T. PHILIPS AND MERCEDES PHILIPS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On October 1, 2021, relators Fred T. Philips and Mercedes Philips filed a petition
for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to vacate its order enforcing a Rule
11 agreement. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 11. Relators assert that the trial court abused its
discretion (1) by granting a motion to enforce a Rule 11 agreement against parties that
raised fact issues and revoked consent to the terms of the Rule 11 agreement, and (2)
because the order granting the motion to enforce a Rule 11 agreement contains “material
terms outside and beyond the Rule 11 agreement.” The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Thomas D. Stikeleather and
Lea Ann Stikeleather, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief
sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of
ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 5th day of October, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Fred T. Philips and Mercedes Philips, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fred-t-philips-and-mercedes-philips-texapp-2021.