in Re Fred Carl Dittman, III v. State
This text of in Re Fred Carl Dittman, III v. State (in Re Fred Carl Dittman, III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00448-CR
IN RE FRED CARL DITTMAN, III, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 15, 2009, relator, Fred Carl Dittman, III, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Mary Lou Keel, presiding judge of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, to vacate her May 5, 2009 order granting the State=s motion to disqualify attorney Robert Scardino from representing relator in the underlying case for aggravated assault of a family member.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Guzman, and Boyce.
Do Not PublishCTex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Fred Carl Dittman, III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fred-carl-dittman-iii-v-state-texapp-2009.