in Re Fred Adkins
This text of in Re Fred Adkins (in Re Fred Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00066-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE FRED ADKINS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Justices Perkes, Benavides, and Longoria Per Curiam Order
Relator, Fred Adkins, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on
February 9, 2014 contending that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside a
jury verdict. Relator requests that this Court conduct a merits-based review of the trial
court’s order granting a new trial. See, e.g., In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 407
S.W.3d 746, 755–59 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding); see also In re Whataburger
Restaurants LP, 429 S.W.3d 597, 598 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re
Health Care Unlimited, Inc., 429 S.W.3d 600, 602 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (per
curiam). The Court requests that the real party in interest, Antonio Gutierrez Tingle, or any
others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to
the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of
this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 2nd day of March, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Fred Adkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fred-adkins-texapp-2015.