Home/S.D. New York/In re Frear

In re Frear

9 F. Cas. 738, 2 Ben. 467, 35 How. Pr. 249, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 660, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 387
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 22, 1868·No. Case No. 5,074·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The debt in question is provable, whether there are any Assets of the copartnership or not. If there are any such assets, they must be administered according to the provisions of section 36 of the act, and so must the assets of the separate estate of the bankrupt

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Frear, 9 F. Cas. 738, 2 Ben. 467, 35 How. Pr. 249, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 660, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 387 (S.D.N.Y. 1868).

9 F. Cas. 738 (In re Frear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarke v. Stanwood
44 N.E. 537 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
West Philadelphia Bank v. . Gerry
13 N.E. 453 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)