In re Frazin

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Frazin

197 Ill. 2d 595

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 2001

DocketMR 17773

StatusPublished

This text of 197 Ill. 2d 595 (In re Frazin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frazin, 197 Ill. 2d 595 (Ill. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Irwin Lee Frazin is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Respondent Irwin Lee Frazin shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Irwin Lee Frazin is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Respondent Irwin Lee Frazin shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. 2d 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frazin-ill-2001.