Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Fraser

In re Fraser

202 A.D.2d 146, 617 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10436
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12, 1977, and is presently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State because he currently practices law in Pennsylvania, where he has resided since 1982. He states that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law and that he is resigning because he does not wish to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints [147]*147pending against him. Therefore, we grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fraser, 202 A.D.2d 146, 617 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 146 (In re Fraser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.