In re Fraser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fraser

202 A.D.2d 146, 617 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 146 (In re Fraser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fraser, 202 A.D.2d 146, 617 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12, 1977, and is presently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State because he currently practices law in Pennsylvania, where he has resided since 1982. He states that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law and that he is resigning because he does not wish to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints [147]*147pending against him. Therefore, we grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12, 1977, and is presently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State because he currently practices law in Pennsylvania, where he has resided since 1982. He states that he has no intention of returning to New York to practice law and that he is resigning because he does not wish to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints [147]*147pending against him. Therefore, we grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 146, 617 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fraser-nyappdiv-1994.