in Re Frankie Bartolo Mercado

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 16, 2017
Docket01-17-00168-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Frankie Bartolo Mercado (in Re Frankie Bartolo Mercado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Frankie Bartolo Mercado, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00167-CR NO. 01-17-00168-CR ——————————— IN RE FRANKIE BARTOLO MERCADO, Relator

Original Proceedings on Petitions for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Frankie Bartolo Mercado, proceeding pro se and incarcerated, has

filed a combined original application for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the

respondent trial judge to rule on his pending pro se “Motion for Court Order for Disclosure of Information of Grand Jury” in his two underlying habeas corpus

proceedings.1

We construe the application as petitions for a writ of mandamus, but deny the

petitions.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

1 The underlying cases are Ex parte Frankie Bartolo Mercado, Cause Nos. 1431388- A & 1431364-A, pending in the 262nd District Court, Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Denise Bradley presiding. We recently denied relator’s pro se petitions seeking the same mandamus relief as that sought here. See In re Frankie Bartolo Mercado, Nos. 01-17-00046-CR & 01-17-00047-CR, 2017 WL 711735, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 23, 2017, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 2 We also dismissed relator’s direct appeals for want of jurisdiction under the related trial court cause numbers 1431388 and 1431364. See Mercado v. State, Nos. 01- 16-00705-CR & 01-16-00706-CR, 2016 WL 7164013, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 8, 2016, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We note that, because our mandates issued on February 17, 2017, making his convictions final, relator may file new article 11.07 habeas petitions with the district court, made returnable with the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (West Supp. 2016); Ex parte Johnson, 12 S.W.3d 472, 473 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Johnson
12 S.W.3d 472 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Frankie Bartolo Mercado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankie-bartolo-mercado-texapp-2017.