In re Frankel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Frankel

839 A.2d 174, 576 Pa. 211, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2498

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 24, 2003

DocketNo. 93 DB 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 839 A.2d 174 (In re Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frankel, 839 A.2d 174, 576 Pa. 211, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2498 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 11, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is DENIED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 11, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is DENIED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

839 A.2d 174, 576 Pa. 211, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankel-pa-2003.