In re Frankel

264 A.D. 299, 35 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4135
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 299 (In re Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Frankel, 264 A.D. 299, 35 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On March 13, 1942, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of abortion. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, she should be disbarred.

! The provisions of the statute above cited are mandatory and upon proof of conviction the order of disbarment follows as matter ;of course, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal from the judgment of conviction. (Matter of Lindheim, 195 App. Div. 827.)

! Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Mitchell
48 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Ray v. Ray
62 Misc. 2d 652 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 299, 35 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankel-nyappdiv-1942.