In re Frankel
This text of 264 A.D. 299 (In re Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 13, 1942, the respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of abortion. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, therefore, she should be disbarred.
! The provisions of the statute above cited are mandatory and upon proof of conviction the order of disbarment follows as matter ;of course, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal from the judgment of conviction. (Matter of Lindheim, 195 App. Div. 827.)
! Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 299, 35 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankel-nyappdiv-1942.