In re Frankel

Second Circuit

In re Frankel

6 F.2d 1014

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 24, 1925·No. No. 183·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupt applied for his discharge; objection' thereto was made, and upon the hearing of such objection the court refused to admit in evidence the examination of the bankrupt under section 21a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9605); the offer of evidence being made by the objecting creditor. This was error, the point having been specifically ruled in Re Wilcox, 109 F. 628, 48 C. C. A. 567.

The order granting discharge is reversed, and the matter remitted to the court below, with directions to admit the rejected evidence and consider anew the petitioner’s application for discharge. The petitioner will recover the costs of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupt applied for his discharge; objection' thereto was made, and upon the hearing of such objection the court refused to admit in evidence the examination of the bankrupt under section 21a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9605); the offer of evidence being made by the objecting creditor. This was error, the point having been specifically ruled in Re Wilcox, 109 F. 628, 48 C. C. A. 567.

The order granting discharge is reversed, and the matter remitted to the court below, with directions to admit the rejected evidence and consider anew the petitioner’s application for discharge. The petitioner will recover the costs of this court.

In re Frankel, 6 F.2d 1014 (2d Cir. 1925).

Pincite

6 F.2d 1014 (In re Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related