In Re Frank Randolph Kelly and Lacy Paige Brooks v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Frank Randolph Kelly and Lacy Paige Brooks v. the State of Texas (In Re Frank Randolph Kelly and Lacy Paige Brooks v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT
In re Frank Randolph Kelly and * Original Mandamus Proceeding Lacy Paige Brooks,
No. 11-24-00066-CV * May 30, 2024
* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)
This court has considered the record in this cause and concludes that Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We direct the trial court to (1) vacate the portion of its February 1, 2024 order denying Frank Randolph Kelly’s and Lacy Paige Brooks’s pleas in abatement and (2) enter and order abating the above-referenced mater. A writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court fails to act by June 19, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Frank Randolph Kelly and Lacy Paige Brooks v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frank-randolph-kelly-and-lacy-paige-brooks-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.