In re Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Frank

18 A.D.2d 817, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 817 (In re Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frank, 18 A.D.2d 817, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to discipline an attorney, petitioner moves to confirm the Official Referee’s report. In his report the Referee finds that certain of the charges have been established by the proof and that certain of the charges have not been established, and he recommends that respondent be suspended from practice for two years. Motion to confirm granted and report confirmed, except as to the measure of discipline to be imposed. In our opinion, respondent’s misconduct was of such a serious nature as to require his disbarment. Accordingly, the Referee’s report is confirmed to the extent indicated, respondent is disbarred and his name ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys, effective as of March 4, 1963. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to discipline an attorney, petitioner moves to confirm the Official Referee’s report. In his report the Referee finds that certain of the charges have been established by the proof and that certain of the charges have not been established, and he recommends that respondent be suspended from practice for two years. Motion to confirm granted and report confirmed, except as to the measure of discipline to be imposed. In our opinion, respondent’s misconduct was of such a serious nature as to require his disbarment. Accordingly, the Referee’s report is confirmed to the extent indicated, respondent is disbarred and his name ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys, effective as of March 4, 1963. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 817, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frank-nyappdiv-1963.