In re Frank

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Frank

590 So. 2d 74, 1991 La. LEXIS 3424, 1991 WL 269721

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 13, 1991

DocketNo. 91-OB-2625

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 590 So. 2d 74 (In re Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frank, 590 So. 2d 74, 1991 La. LEXIS 3424, 1991 WL 269721 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Frank, Mack L; — Plamtiff(s); applying for reinstatement.

Considering petitioner’s application for readmission to the practice of law, the provisions of now superceded Article XV, section 12, the showing made by petitioner at the hearing, the recommendation of the board for readmission and the opposition filed by disciplinary counsel, it is ordered that Mack I. Frank be readmitted to the practice of law. It is further ordered that Mr. Frank pay all costs' of the readmission proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Frank, Mack L; — Plamtiff(s); applying for reinstatement.

Considering petitioner’s application for readmission to the practice of law, the provisions of now superceded Article XV, section 12, the showing made by petitioner at the hearing, the recommendation of the board for readmission and the opposition filed by disciplinary counsel, it is ordered that Mack I. Frank be readmitted to the practice of law. It is further ordered that Mr. Frank pay all costs' of the readmission proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

590 So. 2d 74, 1991 La. LEXIS 3424, 1991 WL 269721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frank-la-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack