in Re Frank Joseph
This text of in Re Frank Joseph (in Re Frank Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00693-CV
In re Frank Joseph
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Frank Joseph has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the
trial court’s order related to his request for DNA testing was unclear.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Having reviewed the petition, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See id. R. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Filed: November 17, 2015
1 According to relator’s petition, the trial court erroneously checked next to the “granted” box and then crossed that out and indicated that the request was instead denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Frank Joseph, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frank-joseph-texapp-2015.