In re Frank J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Frank J.

261 A.D.2d 293, 690 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5764

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about November 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree, gang assault in the second degree, attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, attempted assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence (People v [294] Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about November 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree, gang assault in the second degree, attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, attempted assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence (People v [294] Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

In re Frank J., 261 A.D.2d 293, 690 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 293 (In re Frank J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related