in Re Frank E. Parramore

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2013·No. 03-13-00523-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00523-CV

In re Frank E. Parramore

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had

not timely ruled on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, since relator filed his petition,

the trial court has acted on the petition. Because relator has received a ruling on his habeas petition,

which was the same relief he sought via his mandamus proceeding, we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Filed: August 30, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Frank E. Parramore, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Frank E. Parramore (in Re Frank E. Parramore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.