in Re Frank E. Parramore
This text of in Re Frank E. Parramore (in Re Frank E. Parramore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00523-CV
In re Frank E. Parramore
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had
not timely ruled on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, since relator filed his petition,
the trial court has acted on the petition. Because relator has received a ruling on his habeas petition,
which was the same relief he sought via his mandamus proceeding, we deny the petition for writ
of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
Filed: August 30, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Frank E. Parramore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frank-e-parramore-texapp-2013.