in Re Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola

DecidedSeptember 13, 2016

Docket01-16-00614-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola (in Re Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued September 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00614-CV ——————————— IN RE FRANK COPPOLA AND BRIDGET COPPOLA, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola, have filed a petition for a writ

of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s order denying their motion to designate

responsible third parties.1

1 The underlying case is Nancy Adams and Adams Investment Properties, L.L.C. v. Frank Coppola and Bridget Coppola, cause no. 2015-13321, in the 281st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Sylvia Matthews presiding. We deny the petition and dismiss as moot relators’ agreed motion to stay the

trial setting.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI