in Re Frank Anthony Picone
Opinion
Opinion issued October 11, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00687-CR ——————————— IN RE FRANK ANTHONY PICONE, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Proceeding pro se, relator, Frank Anthony Picone, has filed a petition for a
writ of mandamus, contending that the trial court has failed to rule on his “Motion
for Nunc Pro Tunc.” In 1995, the trial court found relator guilty of the offense of
capital murder and assessed his punishment at confinement for life. He requests that we direct the trial court to issue a judgment nunc pro tunc correcting alleged clerical
errors in the judgment of the trial court.1
We deny the petition.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.
1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Frank Anthony Picone, cause number 685060, in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jan Krocker presiding. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Frank Anthony Picone (in Re Frank Anthony Picone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.