in Re Frank Anthony Picone

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 11, 2016·No. 01-16-00687-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued October 11, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00687-CR ——————————— IN RE FRANK ANTHONY PICONE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Proceeding pro se, relator, Frank Anthony Picone, has filed a petition for a

writ of mandamus, contending that the trial court has failed to rule on his “Motion

for Nunc Pro Tunc.” In 1995, the trial court found relator guilty of the offense of

capital murder and assessed his punishment at confinement for life. He requests that we direct the trial court to issue a judgment nunc pro tunc correcting alleged clerical

errors in the judgment of the trial court.1

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Frank Anthony Picone, cause number 685060, in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jan Krocker presiding. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Frank Anthony Picone, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

in Re Frank Anthony Picone (in Re Frank Anthony Picone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.