In Re Francisco Urbina-Rinconada v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Francisco Urbina-Rinconada v. the State of Texas (In Re Francisco Urbina-Rinconada v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-23-00746-CR
IN RE Francisco URBINA-RINCONADA, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 12, 2025
DENIED
Relator, Francisco Urbina-Rinconada, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After
considering the petition and the record, the court concludes Urbina-Rinconada is not entitled to
the relief sought. Accordingly, we reinstate this case on the court’s active docket and deny the
petition for writ of mandamus.
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14335CR, styled The State of Texas v. Francisco Urbina-Rinconada, pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Penny Anne Roberts presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Francisco Urbina-Rinconada v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-francisco-urbina-rinconada-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.