in Re FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C., Relator's

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C., Relator's

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 17, 2011·No. 04-11-00492-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00492-CV

IN RE FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 17, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators’ petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-03462, styled Javier A. Pena d/b/a PHI Contractors v. Funding Partners, LP, et al., pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00492-CV

IN RE FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 17, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators’ petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-03462, styled Javier A. Pena d/b/a PHI Contractors v. Funding Partners, LP, et al., pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding.

in Re FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C., Relator's, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

in Re FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C., Relator's (in Re FPIC, L.L.C., JEAP SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., DPIC, L.L.C., DPLS, L.L.C., DPLS II, L.L.C., FBP, INC., FPLS, L.L.C., FPLS II, L.L.C., FPMB, INC., DASH PARTNERS, LP, AND PROSPECT, L.L.C., Relator's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.