In re Fox

989 A.2d 254, 201 N.J. 158
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 1, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 989 A.2d 254 (In re Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fox, 989 A.2d 254, 201 N.J. 158 (N.J. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

DANIEL J. FOX of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, having pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to a one-count Information charging him with making a false, fictitious and fraudulent statement to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in violation of 18 U.S.C § 1001, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20—13(b)(1), DANIEL J. FOX is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DANIEL J. FOX be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DANIEL J. FOX comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1001
18 U.S.C. § 1001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
989 A.2d 254, 201 N.J. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fox-nj-2010.